Naoki Nakagawa vs Nishesh Basavareddy Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W L W L L W L L
Form
W L L W W L L L L LH2H: Nakagawa 0 - 0 Basavareddy
They have played 0 sets in total, with Nakagawa winning 0 and Basavareddy winning 0. The last match between Nakagawa and Basavareddy was at the M25 Champaign, 20-07-2023, Second, Hard with Naoki Nakagawa getting the victory w/o.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Naoki Nakagawa | 0 |
| Nishesh Basavareddy | 0 |
M25 Champaign(20-07-2023)
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Maneiro VS Sherif PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Sevastova VS Pavlyuchenkova PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Nakagawa VS Basavareddy H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| w/o | |||||
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Naoki Nakagawa Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats 
Moerani Bouzige
Player
Naoki Nakagawa
46%
(
30 of
65)
1st Serve %
61%
(
42 of
69)
12
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
3
93%
(
28 of
30)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
34 of
42)
66%
(
23 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
22%
(
14 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
22 of
69)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sanhui Shin
Player
Naoki Nakagawa
58%
(
38 of
65)
1st Serve %
62%
(
46 of
74)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
74)
77
Total Points Won
62
|
6-1 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Naoki Nakagawa
Player
Evgeny Karlovskiy
51%
(
47 of
92)
1st Serve %
65%
(
49 of
75)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
51%
(
23 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
41%
(
38 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
75)
85
Total Points Won
82
|
2-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Adrian Mannarino
Player
Naoki Nakagawa
62%
(
50 of
81)
1st Serve %
57%
(
47 of
83)
4
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
5
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
35 of
47)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
32%
(
26 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
32 of
83)
87
Total Points Won
77
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Taiyo Yamanaka
Player
Naoki Nakagawa
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
42%
(
27 of
65)
7
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
27%
(
17 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
28 of
65)
73
Total Points Won
54
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Naoki Nakagawa
Player
Rannmaru Kozuma
52%
(
23 of
44)
1st Serve %
48%
(
24 of
50)
8
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
17 of
23)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
15 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Christian Langmo
Player
Naoki Nakagawa
68%
(
57 of
84)
1st Serve %
57%
(
50 of
87)
13
Aces
13
2
Double Faults
1
82%
(
47 of
57)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
21 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
29 of
87)
92
Total Points Won
79
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Naoki Nakagawa
Player
Ajeet Rai
44%
(
30 of
68)
1st Serve %
68%
(
44 of
65)
3
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
2
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
58%
(
22 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
20 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
25 of
65)
73
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Naoki Nakagawa
Player
Kody Pearson
60%
(
49 of
82)
1st Serve %
75%
(
50 of
67)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
41%
(
34 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
79
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Naoki Nakagawa
Player
Collin Altamirano
49%
(
27 of
55)
1st Serve %
67%
(
30 of
45)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
0
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
38%
(
21 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
18 of
45)
52
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Nishesh Basavareddy Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Elmer Moller
Player
Nishesh Basavareddy
55%
(
26 of
47)
1st Serve %
48%
(
28 of
58)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
10
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
8 of
30)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
38%
(
18 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vitaliy Sachko
Player
Nishesh Basavareddy
66%
(
59 of
89)
1st Serve %
67%
(
56 of
83)
4
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
4
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
33 of
56)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
38%
(
34 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
35 of
83)
90
Total Points Won
82
|
3-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Filip Cristian Jianu
Player
Nishesh Basavareddy
81%
(
42 of
52)
1st Serve %
48%
(
28 of
58)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
19 of
28)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bu Yunchaokete
Player
Nishesh Basavareddy
53%
(
33 of
62)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
68)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
29 of
37)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
18 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Denis Shapovalov
Player
Nishesh Basavareddy
46%
(
26 of
57)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
74)
6
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
2
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
37 of
74)
74
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nishesh Basavareddy
Player
Stefan Kozlov
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
64%
(
36 of
56)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nishesh Basavareddy
Player
James Duckworth
48%
(
25 of
52)
1st Serve %
53%
(
24 of
45)
7
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
2
72%
(
18 of
25)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
56
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Novak Djokovic
Player
Nishesh Basavareddy
68%
(
72 of
106)
1st Serve %
55%
(
71 of
129)
23
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
8
78%
(
56 of
72)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
51 of
71)
62%
(
21 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
29 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
52 of
129)
129
Total Points Won
106
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Gael Monfils
Player
Nishesh Basavareddy
55%
(
48 of
88)
1st Serve %
64%
(
38 of
59)
7
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
0
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
27 of
38)
55%
(
22 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
81%
(
17 of
21)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
34%
(
30 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
25%
(
15 of
59)
73
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nishesh Basavareddy
Player
Alex Michelsen
58%
(
46 of
79)
1st Serve %
63%
(
46 of
73)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
80%
(
37 of
46)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
36 of
46)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
32%
(
25 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
28 of
73)
82
Total Points Won
70
|
2-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60% (325/214) | Win/Loss | 66% (72/37) |
| 58% (725/535) | Sets Win/Loss | 63% (160/94) |
| 52% (6287/5715) | Games Win/Loss | 55% (1280/1060) |
| 61% (193/126) | Hard Win/Loss | 71% (54/22) |
| 60% (112/75) | Clay Win/Loss | 17% (1/5) |
| 61% (20/13) | Indoor Hard W/L | 63% (17/10) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.32 | Aces Per Game | 0.37 |
| 1856 | Aces Total | 426 |
| 0.18 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.31 |
| 1072 | Total Double Faults | 352 |
| 1:19:54 | Average Match Time | 1:36:39 |
| 466.72 | Average Opponent Rank | 291.91 |
| 57% (15996/28069) | 1st Serve % | 58% (4096/7103) |
| 69% (11103/15996) | 1st Serve Win % | 72% (2934/4096) |
| 50% (6070/12073) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (1577/3007) |
| 42% (1166/2769) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (343/782) |
| 39% (11119/28177) | Return Points Win % | 41% (3002/7282) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 50% (2/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/3) | Main Tour W/L | 63% (10/6) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 46% (63/75) | Challenger W/L | 71% (53/22) |
| 66% (262/136) | Futures W/L | 58% (7/5) |
| 60% (321/533) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 68% (70/103) |
| 67% (2/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 20% (1/5) |
| 57% (99/175) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 43% (13/30) |
| 58% (106/182) | Deciding Set Win % | 59% (17/29) |
| 88% (296/259) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (75/62) |
| 13% (296/37) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (75/12) |
| 27% (243/66) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 29% (34/10) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
